Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via March Madness Predictions) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | See live odds → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | See live odds → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | See live odds → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | See live odds → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | See live odds → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Map 1 Winner | 100% |
| Match Winner | 100% |
| O/U 2.5 Games | 100% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 100% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 100% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 100% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | 100% |
| Map 2 Winner | 0% |
| Map Handicap: BTF (-1.5) vs ex-RUSTEC (+1.5) | 0% |
| Map Handicap: ex-RUSTEC (-1.5) vs Butterfly (+1.5) | 0% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | 0% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: ex-RUSTEC (-6.5) vs Butterfly (+6.5) | 0% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: Butterfly (-3.5) vs ex-RUSTEC (+3.5) | 0% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: Butterfly (-9.5) vs ex-RUSTEC (+9.5) | 0% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 30.5 | 0% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: Butterfly (-3.5) vs ex-RUSTEC (+3.5) | 0% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: ex-RUSTEC (-3.5) vs Butterfly (+3.5) | 0% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: ex-RUSTEC (-6.5) vs Butterfly (+6.5) | 0% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | 0% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 27.5 | 0% |
Market context
Butterfly’s quarter-final against ex-RUSTEC is a best-of-three with Butterfly priced as a heavy favourite, and the crowd-implied 100% YES line is consistent with the market’s view that Butterfly are the more reliable side across the series format. Recent form points that way: Butterfly are reported to have won four of their last five, with strong map-level numbers on Mirage and Dust2, while ex-RUSTEC have also been competitive but more uneven, including a straight-sets loss to SPARTA in recent form notes.[1][2][7]
The main historical frame is that both teams have been active in the same event and neither side has a long head-to-head sample to anchor a rivalry read; one listing says they have not met in the last six months, and another notes this is their first recorded meeting. That means the current probability is being driven more by recent map performance and bracket context than by any established matchup edge.[1][7] Liquipedia’s group results also show Butterfly entering the playoffs from a cleaner position than ex-RUSTEC, which reinforces the market’s lean.[9]
For traders, the key catalysts are lineup confirmation, any last-minute schedule shift, and whether the series starts on time or is moved within the settlement window. Public match pages currently show the fixture as underway or imminently scheduled, but live-stat coverage has been patchy, so a delay, walkover, or technical default would matter more here than minor in-game swings.[1][3][5] If either roster is altered before map veto, that would be the clearest reason to reassess the 100% consensus.
Methodology
Sports-specific comparison page for Counter-Strike: Butterfly vs ex-RUSTEC (BO3) - NODWIN Clutch Series Playoffs. Polymarket's live quote (Polygon order book) plus platform attributes for the three reference venues. Sports markets reward liquidity — Polymarket and Betfair are materially deeper than Kalshi or Manifold.
Resolution & payout
Sports markets typically settle on official final-whistle plus league confirmation. Polymarket uses UMA Optimistic Oracle with a source URL per contract — usually official league data feeds or ESPN/Soccerway. Two-hour dispute window, then smart-contract payout in USDC.
FAQ
- Are prediction markets better than sports betting?
- Prediction markets tend toward tighter odds than bookmakers because they use peer-to-peer exchange rather than bookmaker margin. On major matches, Polymarket quotes typically sit 2-5% closer to the true probability model than bet365 or DraftKings.
- What are live sports odds on Polymarket?
- Some top-tier matches stay open during play — you can trade the half-time probability in the 70th minute. Polymarket mid-prices update second-by-second; any frontend mirroring the order book shows the same movement.
- Which sports markets are available?
- Football (soccer) dominates — Champions League, World Cup, Premier League, La Liga, Bundesliga — followed by NFL, NBA, tennis Grand Slams, Formula 1, boxing/MMA. Resolution via official league source confirmation.
- What's the difference between match odds and outright odds?
- Match odds cover a single game ("Bayern beats BVB"). Outright odds are long-term aggregates ("Bayern wins the league"). Outright markets have deeper liquidity; match markets have faster resolution.
- Can I import form data and lineups?
- This page shows the live Polymarket quote as an implied probability. Form data and lineups must be researched separately via sports data providers (e.g. Soccerway, ESPN, FBref) — we surface the market probability, not the sport analysis.
Trade Counter-Strike: Butterfly vs ex-RUSTEC (BO3) - NODWI… on March Madness Predictions
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →